top of page
pexels-tom-fisk-1756312.jpg

Agriculture as Conservation

Agriculture operates within a dichotomy – on one hand, it stands as among the most impactful and destructive practices undertaken by humans; on the other, it presents some of the most effective solutions for reversing climate change and biodiversity loss.

Out of Bounds

Scientists have identified 9 planetary boundaries which regulate the stability and resilience of the Earth’s ecological systems. Within each of these boundaries are a ‘safe operating space’ where life can thrive. Assessments show that six out of nine of these boundaries have been crossed to varying degrees. As we cross these boundaries, complex systems regulating Earth’s climatic and ecological conditions erode. Agriculture, and more specifically livestock production, is a leading cause in 7 out of 9 in surpassing these boundaries.

image.png

Image from Azote for Stockholm Resilience Centre, based on analysis in Richardson et al 2023

Climate Change

Agriculture is a leading cause of climate change worldwide. The majority of agricultural emissions are caused by livestock production. Numerous attempts have been made to estimate total global emissions from livestock alone, ranging from 12% estimations from the UN to 51% estimations from the Worldwatch Institute. While there is much debate about the contributions of agriculture and livestock to climate change, it is certain that addressing their outsized impacts will be critical.

climate-change-2254711_1280.jpg
coral reef with many fish swimming about.jpg

Biosphere Integrity

Scientists have concluded that the boundary for biosphere integrity began faltering during the late 19th century. Today agriculture causes 70% of biodiversity loss around the world, largely due to habitat loss. Since 1970 there has been a 69% decrease in wildlife populations. Today only 2% of terrestrial mammals are wild, and livestock are so prevalent that they outweigh all wild mammals on Earth by a ratio of 15 to 1

Land System Change

Large scale land system changes are extensively fueled by agricultural activity. Today agriculture occupies roughly half of all arable land globally and causes nearly 90% of global deforestation. Further broken down, livestock occupies 77% of all agricultural land while only providing 18% of global calories. Shifting from livestock production to plant-based agriculture alone could result in a reduction of 75% of agricultural land needs, or over a third of arable land around the world.

ai-generated-8309726_1280.jpg

Novel Entities

Scientists found that “the safe operating space of the planetary boundary of novel entities is exceeded since annual production and releases are increasing at a pace that outstrips the global capacity for assessment and monitoring.” These entities include a range common agricultural products including novel pesticides, antibiotics, and genetically modified organisms.

pexels-gilmer-diaz-estela-6345502.jpg
seashells deteriorating from ocean acidification.jpg

Ocean Acidification

Ocean acidification, also known as climate change’s evil twin, is caused by increasing acidity in oceans due to changes in the carbon cycle. With roughly half of all greenhouse gasses absorbed into ocean systems, the pH of oceans is shifting towards unlivable levels for calcifying organisms such as corals and mussels, leading to many knock-on effects.

Biogeochemical Flows

Levels of phosphorus and nitrogen in the environment have increased dramatically due to agricultural practices. 75 of the 115 million tons of nitrogen and 14 of the 25 million tons of phosphorus applied worldwide are not utilized by crops and end up running into rivers, lakes, and natural environments. Excess nitrogen and phosphorus from fertilizers cause explosive growth of algae and large aquatic plants leading to decreased oxygen conditions called ‘dead zones’ where oxygen levels are so low no life can survive. The largest dead zone is in the Gulf of Mexico fed by the Mississippi River and ranges seasonally between 5,000km² to 22,000km².

aerial view of algae bloom off the gulf coast.jpg

Free Range Livestock?

Many around the world tout free range livestock as a solution to the environmental impacts of concentrated industrialized livestock production. A movement has manifested to label free range livestock production as regenerative and holistic. While this labeling has led many organizations and individuals towards free range products, the framing of free range livestock as regenerative requires closer examination. 

With added land use requirements, free range livestock is fueling deforestation around the world.

Photos from Dominican Republic.

Alternatively, a total shift to plant-based systems would free a landmass larger than China, Australia, the European Union, and the continental United States combined for conservation while completely eliminating greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production. While there are reductions in emissions relative to industrial livestock production and some increased levels of biodiversity in free range systems relative to the monocropped systems supplying industrial livestock – the opportunity costs of not transitioning completely from livestock to plant-based systems still lead towards mass extinction.

Kale Farm_edited.jpg

A Thought Experiment

100 Americans transition to plant-based

Agriculture is the perfect place to begin reducing inefficiencies because of its current impact on land usage. Today, agriculture occupies roughly 50% of all arable land around the world. Of the 51 million square kilometers used for agricultural production, 77% is for producing livestock, with the remainder occupied by crops grown for direct human consumption. In turn, the 37 million square kilometers used for meat and dairy production supplies a meager 18% of the global calorie supply, with the remaining 82% coming from plant-based sources.


In other words, less than 12% of habitable land supplies 82% of the global calorie supply. If we transitioned to entirely plant-based diets, we could conserve over 30% of all habitable land without reducing our ability to feed the world.

This shift equates to an area larger than the combined landmass of China, Australia, the European Union, and the continental United States.

This transition offers a dual benefit: complete emission reduction from livestock production and additional gains from carbon sequestration through rewilding and reforestation efforts. This strategy could reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by a minimum of 30%, helping avert the ongoing global ecological crisis.

Image and sources from page 12 of the RAÍCES Institute Report

To learn more about the connections between the food system and the environment, we recommend the books Regenesis by George Monbiot and Food Choice and Sustainability: Why Buying Local, Eating Less Meat, and Taking Baby Steps Won't Work by Richard Oppenlander.

Using climate smart agricultural techniques, agriculturally productive areas can operate in tandem with natural processes maintaining safe havens for wildlife and biodiversity.

By transitioning livestock based systems and using agriculture as a conservation tool, we can readily meet targets to operate within planetary boundaries.

Join us as we make agricultural production and conservation synonymous by creating plant-based communally owned food hubs around the world.

bottom of page